Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

GitHub
BRTH-06 · Multi-Agent Research Brief

3 sequential ToolLoopAgent stages with visible provider switching (Q3 RESOLVED — manual sequential reducer; no native subAgents primitive in AI SDK v6.0.191). researcher (anthropic) → analyzer (openai — visible switch) → editor (anthropic).

Try the canned prompt in the assistant:Research AI SDK v6 ToolLoopAgent patterns.

The chat route enqueues research-brief-taskwhich instantiates 3 separate ToolLoopAgentinstances in sequence — each with its own model, instructions, and explicit stopWhen: stepCountIs(N) (Pitfall 2.B). Each stage emits metadata.set('activeProvider', ...)before its generate(...) call so the timeline shows the per-stage provider badge. The reducer composes the final brief from researcher + analyzer + editor outputs.

Run now
Multi-agent research brief

3 sequential ToolLoopAgent stages · researcher → analyzer → editor · visible provider switching · BRTH-06

Researcher·anthropicAnalyzer·openaiEditor·anthropic

Executive brief

[mock:editor] Executive brief on AI SDK v6 ToolLoopAgent multi-agent pipeline patterns: three findings frame the decision space — architecture, vendor portability, and reliability at scale. The headline insight: locking the architecture first unlocks downstream optionality across providers. Teams that defer the architecture decision typically pay 2-3x more in migration cost when the reliability ceiling is later breached. Recommended next steps: (1) commit to the architecture pattern, (2) validate provider portability with a fixed-cost prototype, (3) instrument reliability from day one. This brief composed via 3 sequential ToolLoopAgent stages (researcher → analyzer → editor) per Plan 02-08 / BRTH-06.

Raw research (researcher stage)

[mock:researcher] On AI SDK v6 ToolLoopAgent multi-agent pipeline patterns, key findings include three primary themes: (1) the underlying architecture imposes constraints that shape downstream choices; (2) industry adoption is uneven across the three core providers; (3) reliability tradeoffs compound under production load.

Raw analysis (analyzer stage)

[mock:analyzer] Synthesizing the researcher's findings on AI SDK v6 ToolLoopAgent multi-agent pipeline patterns: theme (1) suggests teams should lock the architecture before committing to a vendor; theme (2) implies provider portability is worth budgeting for; theme (3) makes the reliability tradeoff the dominant factor at scale.

Pipeline Overview

Keep tabs on lead quality, open opportunities, and conversion rates across the current sales cycle.

Lead Pipeline Value
$284,500+12%

$254,200 last month

Qualified Lead Rate
28.4%-2.5%

30.9% last month

Open Opportunities
42+7

35 last month

Lead-to-Deal Rate
18.1%+1.6%

16.5% last month

Qualified Lead Flow
523 leads

Total qualified leads captured over the last 12 months.

Discovery Calls Booked
184 meetings

35% of qualified leads booked a first call.

184 booked
523 qualified
Upcoming Meetings
08:45
09:00
10:00
10:20
Product demo with Tim
Weblabs Studio
Monthly Proposal Goal
12 sent
18 target

67% of this month's proposal target reached.

Recent Opportunities
Track qualified leads moving through discovery, proposal, and closing stages.
IDAccountStagePriorityHealthValue
Edit
OP-1842
Asteron Bioworks
Proposal Sent
1
On Track
$42,000
OP-1841
BlueHaven Systems
Discovery
1
On Hold
$18,500
OP-1840
Cinder Health
Negotiation
1
At Risk
$63,000
OP-1839
Drift Manufacturing
Qualified
1
At Risk
$26,400
OP-1838
Everline Freight
Proposal Sent
1
Needs Review
$58,900
OP-1837
Fieldstone Capital
Discovery
1
On Track
$31,200
OP-1836
Granite Studios
Negotiation
1
On Track
$15,600
OP-1835
Halcyon Dynamics
Qualified
1
On Hold
$47,900
OP-1834
Ironcrest Ventures
Proposal Sent
1
At Risk
$52,400
OP-1833
Juniper Infrastructure
Discovery
1
At Risk
$22,800

Viewing 10 out of 132 opportunities